The Merchant of Venice

Chesapeake Shakespeare Company - Columbia, Maryland
February 18, 2012


Brad - A
Chelsea B+



So, the Merchant of Venice, where do I start? Well, unfortunately, we weren't able to get a fancy meal before the show, but luckily, they served wine and popcorn.  So far, so good.



The play was in Columbia, Maryland, which is about halfway between DC and Baltimore.  As we pulled into the venue, we learned that the show would be in a church, what appeared to be the youth group room to be exact.  It was, needless to say, an intimate venue.

So, a 30 second summary of the play:  Shylock, a Jewish money-lender, lends Bassanio some dough and Antonio, a wealthy sea merchant, guarantees the loan.  However, because Antonio had been a jerk to Shylock in the past, rather than guaranteeing the loan with money, he required Antonio to guarantee the loan with a pound of his flesh.  Antonio agreed.  But then none of Antonio's ships made it to port.  And Antonio couldn't repay his debt. And Shylock was determined to get a pound of Antonio's flesh.  The case goes to court, and because I don't want to ruin it for anyone who hasn't seen it, Antonio uses some sleek legal moves to save his flesh.  Shylock ends up losing everything.

I though the production was good.  The staging was tough, but they did a lot with what they had.  But for some reason, the Director had the actors run on and off stage.  Normally, you may not notice this, but when there is very little room between the actors and the audience, it can be unnerving.  You get nervous about tripping the actors or whether the actors may simply run you over.  But I like this play a lot, and I liked the production.

At intermission, Chelsea and I ran into a fellow I've worked with in the past and it turns out he is a theatre critic.  It turns out theatre critics get free tickets... And I think this little blog should count as a critique of sorts (ignore the fact I give all of the plays an A).  Free tickets anyone?

Also, after seeing this play, I am more convinced than ever that whoever wrote Shakespeare had to have legal training.  This is Mark Twain's favorite argument against the Stratfordian theory, and I think I agree with him.

This weekend, March 2-4, Chelsea and I are headed to Chapel Hill for a couple of plays.  That's right, while Duke and the Tar Heels play, we will be in Chapel Hill watching Henry V.

What has my life become?

Brad-Lock.

Short - but not Little!

So, the Oscar's are fast approaching and they just so happen to be my favorite event of the year! I'm not kidding, I wake up early for nominee day, I feel robbed when my pick doesn't win, and am urged to stop watching with stuff like Benjamin Button or War Horse wins things (sorry shrinking men and horse lovers). One of the things that makes me LOVE DC, through the traffic and angry escalator people, is the movie scene here. Each year they put all of the nominated short films in the theatre and you see them all as one big movie. They also do a Best Picture marathon that last 18 hours and ends at like 5am. DCians are hardcore.While I have seen most of the best picture so 18 hours is not for me, the shorts make me beyond happy! I love sitting in the theatre for 5 movies in a row! So, this weekend we did just that. Took the afternoon and saw all of the nominees for Animated and Live Action short films. And because I am a lover and maybe you will actually watch the Oscars and this could help I wanted to give a brief review of them:

Live Action

Pentecost (Ireland)
This is a super cute and funny story of a little Irish boy who fails at his first shot at alter boy and is given a second chance when the Bishop comes to visit. They lightly play at the pressure of a Catholic service by talking about it in terms of a soccer game (or to the more traveled Europeans in the crowd, football). They have a pre-mass pep talk, they talk about trading the alter boys, and build up the hype of the mass. It is silly and cute and a funny premise but all and all it was a bit too silly.

Raja (German/India)
This was INTENSE! It is the story of a German couple who adopts a child from India. On their first day with the child they lose him in the crowd. In the craziness that follows to find the father finds out that the boy has parents and was taken from them to be sold to new families. He confronts the orphanage and finds there is really nothing he can do in this foreign country. Meanwhile, the police find the child and return him to the couple. The husband tells his wife that this boy has a family that reported him missing and she asks him to forget about it. What could you do in this situation? The mother has bonded with this child, the adoption is complete, they are leaving the next day and they find out he has a family. I'm not going to spoil it but it was an intense 20 minutes! The music alone made me think someone was always going to die. It was good! I think it could definitely be a contender. Definitely brought up some stirring questions.

 Time Freak (USA)
Oh the American! Last year an American one won this category. I thought it was horrible and therefore am a bit bias on my home country's short films (just ask Brad for my rant).So, this was a silly little film that had the audience cracking up in our theatre. It is about a 20 something who creates a time machine and instead of going back to Ancient Rome - his dream - he ends up re-doing his last day for over a year to avoid 2 awkward conversations. It was a funny idea. He is embarrassed by overreacting to a dry cleaner and each time he goes back to redo the conversation he makes it worse and worse. He runs into a girl and gets progressively more awkward with her with each redo. It was cute and annoyingly I feel like the academy would go for it. I don't think it was Oscar worthy but it would definitely be a good "Funny or Die!"

The Shore (Northern Ireland)
I would say this was my least favorite. The story surrounded a man who brought his daughter back to Ireland from America after being away for 25 years. He tells his daughter that when he left he ditched his fiance and best friend (who are now married) and lost touch with them. He feels awful and thinks it is time to make amends. That pretty much sums it up. There there some cute lines and funny moments but all and all the premise seemed dull.

Tuba Atlantic (Norway)
Best for last! This is the story of an old man that is given 6 days to live. He returns home to die in peace but is visited by a young girl that is his "Angel of Death" to help him cope with this phase. He is grumpy, she is overzealous, it is perfect. He spends his last days hating seagulls (which is hilarious) and building this large machine you don't quite understand. He finally explains that it is a tuba and when he was a kid he and his brother always thought they could build one that could be heard across the sea. His brother now lives in New Jersey and they haven't spoken in 30 years. Before he dies he just wants to hear from him. On his 6th day he makes the tuba work! It blows out windows, knocks sheep into the sea, and is all over the news. It is also heard in the U.S. and a Norwegian man living there says he knows the cause. You hear him on the radio saying "We did it!" as the old man dies. It is heartbreaking and happy and funny. I am banking on this one! It was wonderful!

Animated


Dimanche (Canada)

This means Sunday in French (thank you Peace Corps language program) and is all about this little boys imagination on a lazy Sunday. He visits his grandmother, sits through church, and wandering through the boring world of adults all while imagining funny scenarios. Really not a whole lot happens but it is a cute lazy Sunday with a cute little boy.

The Fantastic Flying Books of Mr. Morris Lessmore (USA)
As mad as I am at Americans for live action shorts, Americans make some wicked awesome animated movies! This is a story of a man who is sucked into a tornado and ends up in a sad black and white world. He stumbles upon a magical library full of color and flying books. Seriously the flying books are amazing. It is so hard not to see them as little creatures. He spends his time taking care of the books and writing his own. It ends with a tear jerking goodbye (I may have cried a little but that means nothing because as Brad says I cry over Chimpanzee trailers - which if you have seen that trailer you would understand..so sad!!) I think this could win it but I am between this and the next. A lot of the buzz is that this is too pretentious and self important. I think anything that makes books magical is worth my vote!

Wild Life (Canada)
Here is the Debbie Downer of the animated series. This is the story of a young British buck in the 1900s moving to Canada to be a cowboy (this made all of the American audience laugh) and in the process learns how lonely and unhappy he is. He pretends he is making it on his own all the way until the final letter he writes his family before walking out in the snow to die. It is sad and depressing but beautiful! The story is compelling and the art of the animation is amazing. It is just a moving piece of art. It may not have made me cry like flying books but I think this could (and probably will) take the category. It was just stunning.

A Morning Stroll (U.K.)
This cute story shows one scene of a man walking down the street when a chicken passes him, walks up to a house, knocks (with his beak naturally) and is let in by an unknown person. But, the kicker is it shows this same scene from 1959 in black and white with stick animation, to 2009 with technicolor, hip hop, iPhone awesomeness, to 2059 in a zombie post apocalypse world. Each of the eras are fun and make fun of themselves and all together it is good. I will not endorse this however because in the 2059 version the man steps on a head of a dead zombie and it is gory. I did not like this.

There you have it. If you made it this far I'm impressed and grateful and hope this helps in your Oscar pickin! If your town does this, I highly recommend seeing the films. I mean you can't beat only needing to pay attention for 15 minutes at a time!

Chelsea




Pericles - A Plastic Skepticism

The Rude Mechanicals - Ellicott City, MD
January 28th, 2012


Brad - A
Chelsea - C+

On very short notice Brad and I found a community theatre that was showing one final performance of Pericles.

So, we loaded up the Honda and heading towards Baltimore. We stopped just short on a very dark road that would take us to the Howard County Community Center. It was awesome. It contained a small art gallery that we wandered through because we are curious monkeys and we found this treasure:

It actually was really great but the title had me cracking up and Brad and I doing some serious soul searching all night

"A Plastic Skepticism", not real skepticism, not metal skepticism but that plastic kind. I sort of loved it and would like to thank Greg for his clever creativity some day!

Ok, on to the show. Here is what Pericles is about: Pericles figures out that the king of his country is having a fling with his daughter and the king encourages him to flee because the king does not love this secret getting out. So, Pericles flees to an island that is crippled by famine. He gives them a bunch of food and the king says he owes him. He then is off again and his ship is wrecked on another island. This time a king is having a tournament and the winner gets his daughter. Obviously, the wicked awesome Pericles wins, marries the daughter, and immediately she is 'with child." He then gets a letter that he needs to return him. His wife gives birth on board the boat home but dies. In classy Shakespearian fashion he throws her overboard and gives his baby daughter to that king he saved from famine because being a single dad is pretty tough. Little does he know his wife lives and his daughter is sold into prostitution (totally believable right?) . Pericles is told his daughter has died so without his wife and daughter he goes into depression and take to the sea! On his journeys he bumps into his grown daughter and together they just happen to run into his dead wife. They are all reunited and live happily ever after!

Here is what was the MOST important part of the night:

The left side pony tail is a man's and the right side is a woman's. It was amazing and I struggled to watch the actual play.

As for the show. It was kind of horribly awesome. The set was a cardboard boat and a wall that they turned around to show a different scene. Each time they needed to turn them a guy went 3,2,1 and they turned. You heard him every time and once one of the guys went the wrong way. It was adorable and awful and we both laughed. The actors were trying so hard and I did laugh out loud multiple times. Sometimes with them some times at them but hey it was a comedy that's what you're supposed to do!




A bunch of people believe Shakespeare didn't write all of this plays. Often people think that half of this play was written by a inferior writer named George Wilkins. So, they acted the play out like there were 2 writers and they were fighting over the plot. It was funny and cute and I was really impressed by their take. All and all for community theatre I really liked it! Afterwords, Brad met up with a lady friend and ditched me
She was well dressed.

Then we just drove until we found a local watering hole for dinner. This is what we stumbled upon:


It is called Loafers and it right next to the Beauty 4 U store. I mean it was classy. The menu was 15 pages long and you could get anything from seafood to spaghetti to steak and there was a DJ playing beats. It was wonderful.

It was fun and I have to say this hobby is taking us on some fun little adventures! Next we get to head to Raleigh, NC for a weekend extravaganza! But, not before the Oscars on the 26th...my favorite day of the year! I hope you have seen The Artist...it is taking home the gold and is just plain amazing!!!

Chels

Book Reviews!

So, I've read a few books on the authorship question since we started our year of Shakespeare. The authorship question is the ongoing debate about who actually wrote the plays attributed to William Shakespeare.  And Yes, this is an ongoing debate, though the recent movie Anonymous has reinvigorated the debate.



Okay, I realize I probably bored our reader[s] by this point, so I will add random pictures to this post to keep people interested.  The above reflects what Chelsea truly thinks about my bow ties, and below is Chelsea at her local wand store.


Book 1: Shakespeare by Another Name by Mark Anderson.  This book was great! It is a biography of Edward De Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, that highlights the similarities between events in De Vere's life and events in Shakespeare plays.  For example, like Hamlet, De Vere was once abducted by pirates and left on the shore naked.  The book also makes a very convincing argument that De Vere, unlike most folks in Elizabethan England, had access to particular books that Shakespeare plays are based on. Mark Anderson, the author, is one of the foremost Oxfordians --- the group of folks that think Edward De Vere wrote all of the plays attributed to Shakespeare --- and his book makes a very convincing case for Oxford.

Back to random pictures for my ADD audience . . .


These two fellows have agreed to perform any Shakespeare plays --- yes, on Segways --- that Chelsea and I can't find.



Book 2: Will in the World by Stephen Greenblatt.  This author is a hard-core Stratfordian --- the group of people who think Will Shakespeare actually wrote all of the plays.  This is a biography of William Shakespeare, also highlighting the similarities between Shakespeare's life and events in Shakespeare's plays.  But it is far less convincing than the De Vere biography.  The connections between the plays and the biography are far more tenuous, and he even admits you need to use your imagination to connect the dots.

Book 3: Contested Will by James Shapiro (Stratfordian).  This book traces the history of the authorship question, and it argues that everyone went wrong by reading the plays biographically.  So, it attempts to undermine both of the other books I read.  This is a good, quick read, but it is not very persuasive.  It is tough to believe that someone wrote 37 plays purely from their imagination, without writing from personal experience at all.

Conclusion: I think Oxfordians have the best arguments if you read the plays biographically, and to an extent, I think it is appropriate to read the plays biographically.  But the Stratfordians still have a very strong argument:  Shakespeare's name is on the plays, and historically, he was an actor and theatre investor in Elizabethan and Jacobean England.  So, in the end, I need to read more.  But not right now because Puppy Bowl VIII just started. GO MARBLES! AND Has anyone noticed Puppy of the Day at the bottom of this blog? Totally Shakespearean. That guy --- whoever he was --- loved puppies.

Speaking of puppies...



Brad